Go Back   Clunk's Forums. > Product Reviews. > Reviews.

Reply
 
LinkBack (10) Thread Tools Display Modes

  #441  
Old 13-01-2008, 08:51
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 4
Thanked 320 Times in 276 Posts
Default

welcome back vwgolfman,
Nice to see you making progress. As I tjink we mentioned earlier small ffts stresses the cpu . Large ffts memory. Blend runs each alternatively so testing the whole. With the same logic your cpu temps will be lower using blend than small ffts. Using the resukts from this poat talkig about your Zalman CNPS9700-LED Super Aero Flower Cooler

Applying your fft result your max will be 65C hit on small fft runs, but on blend your average wil be ~5C lowe maybe 59~60C you'll need to note them on your blend test. So Yep I'd be pretty happy running those temps , though it's your decision of course

If you can run your memory at is stable at 4-4-4-12 @ 852 1.8V fine stick with it, thats good, I find with mine it still needs about 2v at that speed. I think 2.15v is within the voltage envelope for your ram, so your ok, but like everything less is morere , so if you don't need the voltage don't use it, you get less heat as a benefit.

Quote:
It is that Corsair Dominator stuff with the heatsinks so will I be OK temperature-wise?
I'm not quiet sure what you mean here ?? But if you run below 2v your memory should be ok without active cooling , if that's your question.

luck
Reply With Quote

  #442  
Old 13-01-2008, 08:51
abit fanboi
BUFF's System Specs
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karas View Post
just a question.. on my ix38qgt the multiplier for ram PC2-8500 is "1:2.00 (DDR2-1088)" ? why 1088 ? *_*
abits typically run a ~2% overclock out of the box.
I think that if you check you'll find your CPU bus ~2% over the CPU's rated stock.
Reply With Quote

  #443  
Old 13-01-2008, 14:46
karas's Avatar
teh noob
karas's System Specs
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFF View Post
abits typically run a ~2% overclock out of the box.
I think that if you check you'll find your CPU bus ~2% over the CPU's rated stock.
loool it's true xD thanks

EDIT: trying to overclock a little the CPU at 1:1.00.. 300fsb.. with the Small FFT test cpu temp = 45°C but what about the "PWM Phase 0,1,2..." ? What are they ? The temp seen on uGuru is correct for them ? (with this test it's ~70-75°C O_o)
__________________
- CyberPunk -

Last edited by karas; 13-01-2008 at 15:19.
Reply With Quote

  #444  
Old 13-01-2008, 15:50
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 4
Thanked 320 Times in 276 Posts
Default

PWM are the digital circuits that replace the mossfets on earlier boards. It stands for Pulse Width Modulation. It's used to provide power regulation & stable current, it works by switching power on & off, ie a pulse.
CPU VTT voltage is the main factor controlling PWM. It can be used in conjunction with Vcore & GTL ref, to provide a stable platform for the CPU.
Reply With Quote

  #445  
Old 13-01-2008, 16:04
karas's Avatar
teh noob
karas's System Specs
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

mhh.. i see.. and what about the temperature ? with blend it goes at 70-75°C stable.. is it bad ? :/
__________________
- CyberPunk -
Reply With Quote

  #446  
Old 13-01-2008, 18:08
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 4
Thanked 320 Times in 276 Posts
Default

70~75 is fine, have a look at some of the screenshoots of Guru in the benchmarks etc., linked in Post' #1
Reply With Quote

M704b_12.b09 (12 Official BTA)
  #447  
Old 14-01-2008, 16:09
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 4
Thanked 320 Times in 276 Posts
Default M704b_12.b09 (12 Official BTA)

New beta bios Courtesy of Gilgamesh M704B_12.09
There is an changelog in this but i can't say i've learnt anything from it. If any body has any ideas please let me know.
WARNING I was sloppy when i updated, didn't load defaults before flashing, flashed from 8x470. As a result I had C1 error. Only managed to cure it by using cheapo ddr2 stick & changing voltage So don't do as I do. Flash at your own risk.




M704B_12.B09 - Initial Feedback

Last edited by supershanks; 18-01-2008 at 08:25.
Reply With Quote

M704b_12.b09 (12 Official BTA) Initial Feedback
  #448  
Old 14-01-2008, 16:57
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 4
Thanked 320 Times in 276 Posts
Default M704b_12.b09 (12 Official BTA) Initial Feedback

1) Pi & Everest Benches Comparison 8x470@1:1.20
________32M PI_______1M PI_________WP32M_____WP 1024_______Everest R_____ W______COPY___Latency
12.05____14.22.312____13.656________12.265______39 0.296_______9210________8437____9069____56.3
12.06____13:53.766____13.672________11.675______38 9.593_______9204________8463 ___9094____56.4
12.08____14.06.907____13.640________11.922______38 8.343_______9279________8509____9136____56.0
12.09____14:03.750____13.672________11.437______35 8.078_______9269________8493____9131____56.2
12.09 8x470@1:1:20 Benches


12.08 8x470@1:1:20 Benches



Aquamark
_____Aquamark___CPU_____GFX
12.06 201,845___21,450___38,112
12.08 202,088___21,490___38,160
12.09 202,591___21,357___38,523

12.09 8x470@1:1:20 Aquamark


12.08 8x470@1:1:20 Aquamark


For Ethel
AND 1:1.25 Works
12.09 8x470@1:1:25 1175Mz
Went direct to :1.25 on previous settings , Post Froze. But there is good news , the OC recovery cut in & smoothly took me to previous settings. Every other attempt on previous BTAs has needed at least a clear Cmos. Slackened tras from 10 to 12 & got there , benches don't look much better that Will rerun later with old timings & voltage tweaked

________32M PI_______1M PI_________WP32M_____WP 1024_______Everest R_____ W______COPY___Latency
1:1.20____14:03.750____13.672________11.437______3 58.078_______9269________8493____9131____56.2
1:1.25____14:19.891____13.687________11.344______3 61.780_______9249________8507____9131____56.3

Update: - Following reboot got C1 Error. Usual resolution, clear cmos, cheapo ddr2 stick vdimm to 2v & back up. Clocked down to 450 x 8 @1:1.25 1125Mz & got the same.

Seems a definite improvement but not there yet, may need a bit of tweaking, but you tend to lose enthusiasm doing repeated C1 Recoveries.


3DMark06 12703

Guru CPU Temp
Just noticed last night that the Guru Temp, corrected in an earlier BTA is now back to reading nonsense again.

Last edited by supershanks; 18-01-2008 at 08:28.
Reply With Quote

  #449  
Old 14-01-2008, 19:38
glowball's Avatar
Senior Member
glowball's System Specs
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Essex, UK.
Posts: 140
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Hmmm, and there was you hoping the next one was probably going to be a 'final'.
Still, mustn't complain, at least they are getting updated regularly.
Guess the 1:1.25 is still a problem, personally I'd like to see something between that and 1:1.5.

EDIT: Should have read comments on xtremesystems first, it appears 1:1.25 is now working so I will go ahead and try this one!
Well done Abit (if this correct).
__________________

Last edited by glowball; 14-01-2008 at 19:45.
Reply With Quote

  #450  
Old 14-01-2008, 20:30
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 4
Thanked 320 Times in 276 Posts
Default

Hi m8,
well
Quote:
nd there was you hoping the next one was probably going to be a 'final'.
wasn't particularly hoping , just thought it might be there.
Have done benches but not tried 1:1.25 yet after the c1 incident when i flashed

will try it after.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/reviews/861-abit-ix38-quad-gt-living-review-ii.html
Posted By For Type Date
ABIT IX38 QuadGT [Topic Unique] - Carte mère - Hardware - FORUM HardWare.fr This thread Refback 10-03-2010 00:47
Best x38 board !!! - Overclockers Forums This thread Refback 14-01-2010 21:58
[Sammelthread] Abit IX38 QuadGT (Intel X38) - Seite 11 - Forum de Luxx This thread Refback 05-08-2009 10:09
Abit IX38 Quad GT - Page 3 - HEXUS.community discussion forums This thread Refback 06-04-2009 15:35
DFI Lanparty LT X38-T2R - Info, overclocking tips & photos [56k user friendly] This thread Refback 15-03-2009 05:37
EVEREST problem with Asus P5K Pro - Lavalys Discussion Forum This thread Refback 08-03-2009 17:14
P35 or X-38 - Page 2 - HEXUS.community discussion forums This thread Refback 27-02-2009 22:11
[Sammelthread] Abit IX38 QuadGT (Intel X38) - Seite 7 - Forum de Luxx This thread Refback 19-02-2009 15:23
bit-tech.net | Abit IX38 QuadGT - Comments This thread Refback 20-01-2009 00:17
Mati?ne plo?e (Procesori i MBO) @ Bug Online Forum This thread Refback 10-01-2009 03:38



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19.


vBulletin skins developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright© Clunk.org.uk 2010
| Home | Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |