Go Back   Clunk's Forums. > Product Reviews. > Reviews.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

  #421  
Old 14-09-2008, 00:24
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 199
Thanks: 1
Thanked 62 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clunk View Post
nes that do work are the Corsair 9-9-9-24 4gb kit, the OCZ 2000MHz kit was ok, but OCZ do not support them when used on this board, in other words, if you can't hit 2000MHz, it's not their fault
Can't say I would blame OCZ or any other manufacturer really. Would most likely be a board issue rather then the memory.
Reply With Quote

  #422  
Old 14-09-2008, 00:59
eva2000's Avatar
Member
eva2000's System Specs
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clunk View Post


Still no 500fsb+ / 2000+ though on the T3RS?
yeah it's a shame, if DFI could get this board to 580+ FSB it would be one ripper of a board with it's strong mem clocking ability
Reply With Quote

  #423  
Old 14-09-2008, 01:15
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 3,062
Thanks: 3
Thanked 200 Times in 174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
yeah it's a shame, if DFI could get this board to 580+ FSB it would be one ripper of a board with it's strong mem clocking ability
True , I'm only at 1950 here 4,388 7.5x585@3.33D 1,950Mhz 7-7-7-21 Life's a bitch
Reply With Quote

  #424  
Old 14-09-2008, 02:24
Clunk's Avatar
Monkey Trousers.
Clunk's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 7,189
Thanks: 366
Thanked 343 Times in 320 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Wow, look at the price of those now! A couple of months ago, they were £280
Reply With Quote

  #425  
Old 14-09-2008, 07:07
Junior Member
hostility's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

(This is my first post, so forgive me if this is a really nooby question)

Well, I'm about to build a new rig and was considering this board (it looks rather amazing), but after reading through this thread, it seems like it'd be a huge struggle. I plan on using a q9550 (possibly with 8gb of ram, 4 sticks, possibly a nightmare for overclocking) and mildly overclocking. Should I just stop and look for a different board? (any suggestions if yes?)
I don't really have the patience to put as much work as some of the people in this thread have put into it (over the past few MONTHS of tweeking?). Would it be worth it in the long run to get this board and tweak it?
Reply With Quote

  #426  
Old 14-09-2008, 14:56
Member
WeiserRiese's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

hey, i have another question, would the TW3X4G1600-C9DHX (2x2gb corsair 1600hmz 9-9-9-24) work on the X48-T3RS?
Reply With Quote

  #427  
Old 14-09-2008, 15:39
Clunk's Avatar
Monkey Trousers.
Clunk's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 7,189
Thanks: 366
Thanked 343 Times in 320 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hostility View Post
(This is my first post, so forgive me if this is a really nooby question)

Well, I'm about to build a new rig and was considering this board (it looks rather amazing), but after reading through this thread, it seems like it'd be a huge struggle. I plan on using a q9550 (possibly with 8gb of ram, 4 sticks, possibly a nightmare for overclocking) and mildly overclocking. Should I just stop and look for a different board? (any suggestions if yes?)
I don't really have the patience to put as much work as some of the people in this thread have put into it (over the past few MONTHS of tweeking?). Would it be worth it in the long run to get this board and tweak it?
Welcome to the forums

If you don't have a lot of patience and time and effort to put in, then this board isn't for you - it absolutely needs time spent setting it up and finding what works best for your gear.
Reply With Quote

  #428  
Old 14-09-2008, 15:57
Member
WeiserRiese's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

@Clunk:

whats the different between TW3X4G1600-C9DHX and the TW3X4G1600-C9DHXNV? are the last ones tested for Nvidia boards? would both run on T3RS? I know I have a lot of questions, but I am glad that I found this Forum
Reply With Quote

  #429  
Old 14-09-2008, 19:06
Clunk's Avatar
Monkey Trousers.
Clunk's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 7,189
Thanks: 366
Thanked 343 Times in 320 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Yes, the last ones have Nvidia EPP which is of no use on Intel boards.

I had been running the Nvidia ones on the T3RS with no problems - see the review in the reviews section

Also see page 3 or 4 of this review.
Reply With Quote

  #430  
Old 14-09-2008, 19:34
Member
WeiserRiese's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

ok thank you I will change to these rams if a newer bios dont change anything


whats about the warranty if I do a biosupdate? Am I going to lose the warranty?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dfi, gtl, lanparty, living, phase, ref, review, t3rs, x48, x48-t3rs

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:48.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright© Clunk.org.uk 2008
| Home | Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |