Aye, one of the probes on my QX9650 is stuck too, but it doesn't worry me too much, the other 3 are within a respectable tolerance of each other.
On a slightly different note, I've decided (for now) to stop trying to overclock the
FSB, at least until DFI release a
bios that clocks quad cores a bit better. I got a bit fed up trying all kinds of different settings for
GTL ref voltages for both CPU and
FSB at 1.2
VTT (tried 61%, 63%, 67% and everything inbetween...) I can find areas where it seems
more stable, but not quite bang on using 0725, which is actually better than the previous bioses, so I'm hoping further releases will fix it. Fingers crossed.
At the moment I'm on 3.6GHz CPU, 333MHz
FSB, 1333MHz memory, with timings of 6-5-5-15 1T and it's rock solid, with only a bit more
NB voltage and CPU voltage (I'm not at home so I don't remember the exact settings, but I think it's about 1.29V on the CPU and 1.35V on the
NB).
GTL voltages are set to auto, and pretty much everything else is set to auto (bar the memory timings ofc).
Could a bad clocking CPU be responsible for not reaching any high
FSB overclocks, considering it clocks alright and within expected voltages with the multiplier? I can't get past 350-360
FSB without having to fiddle with
GTL voltages, which to me seems quite low, but this is my first overclocking experience since clocking an Athlon X2... so I really don't know how it should be going to be honest.