Gigabyte X48T DQ6 Living Review - Page 7

supershanks · #61 04-04-2008, 13:00

As an example I went back to the 7.5x500 Clock using 3.33 Divider giving 16667Mhxz DDr3

1N
Click to Enlarge

2N
Click to Enlarge

Looking at everest as the most consistent measure:-

So if your memory can run it it's worth about 1~2% extra mine needs to change at 1700Mhz at present on the Official F4 Bios. On the Asus P5E3 I was able to run 1T at 1800Mhz,

Ace-a-Rue · #62 05-04-2008, 01:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperShanks

So I dropped the command rate from 1N to 2N & went back to 3.33D , 1700Mhz DDr3.
Seems like that anandtech claim

Quote:

Originally Posted by anandtech

The options are Auto, 1N and 2N. A setting of 1N can be used almost exclusively while overclocking, bringing a performance advantage of around 2ns to memory access latency. If memory speeds over DDR3-1800 are desired then a setting of 2N may be required for stability.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperShanks

from earlier might be based on hand picked ram I guess it puts me firmly with

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace-a-Rue

.most of us 'johns' do not get the opportunity to buy hand picked memory...

that was a good exercise of proof to show some reviewers from other sites have not been subjected to retail cra*p

that is out there...i presume anandtech.com gets the prem-o, hand picked hardware since their site has a lot of clout.

supershanks · #63 05-04-2008, 08:17

Quote:

that was a good exercise of proof to show some reviewers from other sites have not been subjected to retail cra*p that is out there.

cheers ace , though I do rate the Anendtech reviews highly , it must be hard for the likes of Rajinder Gill, the autor,to be aware at the time whether they have a handpicked sample. If your reviewing new technology in particular is it great product or hand picked. Guess the reviewer would alienate the supplier if he suggested that , while he doeas the same to his readers if he doesn't. Fortunately as I've just shown , we're not in that position yet

luck

Ace-a-Rue · #64 05-04-2008, 16:26

anandtech probably gets a lot of samples sent to them to test like memory...you know that stuff will be thoroughly cherry picked so it does not fall short of expectations.

supershanks · #65 05-04-2008, 16:40

Quote:

you know that stuff will be thorughly cherry picked so it does not fall short of expectations.

Exactly

None of that there, here

supershanks · #66 06-04-2008, 22:46

Added 8Hr Prime run from today & Bios settings to E8200 7.5x500 @3.33D = 166DDR 7-6-5-18

Am trying to see what max FSB is

Will then sehoew I can use that with the memory speed.

supershanks · #67 06-04-2008, 23:00

Turned up the multi on my stable E8200 7.5x500 @3.33D = 166DDR 7-6-5-18 to 8 :-
Nice benches but seems much less stable than 7.5, well so far

Click to Enlarge

Ace-a-Rue · #68 07-04-2008, 00:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by supershanks

Added 8Hr Prime run from today & Bios settings to E8200 7.5x500 @3.33D = 166DDR 7-6-5-18

Am trying to see what max FSB is

Will then sehoew I can use that with the memory speed.

very nice SS!!

what Vdimm did you use to hold 1666 mhz?

i'm anxious to get my board back to start with the 9650.

EDIT:...just checked your slides and i see about 1.85 for Vdimm...pretty good!...the "E" series is a heck darn easier to overclock!

Ace-a-Rue · #69 07-04-2008, 01:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by supershanks

Turned up the multi on my stable E8200 7.5x500 @3.33D = 166DDR 7-6-5-18 to 8 :-
Nice benches but seems much less stable than 7.5, well so far

why the difference between Everest memory bus speed and CpuZ?

darn good write and copy speeds and to boot, your PL is "9"...GEEZ!!

Ace-a-Rue · #70 07-04-2008, 01:19

i should probably mention that i was able to take my replacement QX9650 up to 490 FSB using the 8X multi on the IP35 Pro...i was able to run wPrime 1024M at 490 FSB...i tried 495 FSB and it was flaky!