Go Back   Clunk's Forums. > Product Reviews. > Reviews.

Reply
 
LinkBack (190) Thread Tools Display Modes

  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #301  
Old 12-02-2008, 02:14
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 3,062
Thanks: 3
Thanked 200 Times in 174 Posts
Default

Quote:
okay, so i'm back to 3.0GHz trying to figure out exactly what the problem is. so i currently have a ratio of 5 to 8. which seems to remain the same when i go to 355x9. is it better to have a ratio or 1 to 1 or do i want to go a lil higher than 1:1?
well 5:8 gives faster ram than 1:1 for same FSB so if it's stable than that's cool.
Reply With Quote

  #302  
Old 12-02-2008, 02:20
Zenoth's Avatar
Junior Member
Zenoth's System Specs
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

supershanks, so you say that increasing the PCI-E frequency and voltage should help for stability? But wouldn't it potentially damage my graphics card permanently? And why would that setting influence on the Memory for example? I wouldn't want to risk anything.
Reply With Quote

  #303  
Old 12-02-2008, 09:53
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 3,062
Thanks: 3
Thanked 200 Times in 174 Posts
Default

No it won't damage your board, but it's up to you if you don't want to do it , it's fine.
It's a long used tip from when I 1st got my board back in october , there where 2 posts from the same guy, Alcibiades on Xtreme, who set me on the way with the board:-
Alcibiades Handy Hints #1
Alcibiades Handy Hints #2

luck
Reply With Quote

  #304  
Old 12-02-2008, 19:27
lokeey's Avatar
Overclocker in Training
lokeey's System Specs
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 56
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

since i can't seem to find a stable clock with 355x9, should i attempt maybe 400x8? do you think this would make a difference? or is this something that is not recommended?
__________________
CPU: IC2 Q6600 G0 Stepping
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X38-DQ6
Memory: 4GB G.Skill 8500
Graphics Card: Asus EAH3870HD
Hard Drive(s): 2x74GB WD Raptor (RAID 0) & 200GB WD
Power Supply: Corsair HX620w
Case: Thermaltake Armor Series
CPU Cooling:Zalman 9700LED
GPU Cooling: Zalman VF-1000LED
OS: XP Pro-SP2
Monitor: Hanns-G 19" WS
Reply With Quote

  #305  
Old 12-02-2008, 20:44
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 3,062
Thanks: 3
Thanked 200 Times in 174 Posts
Default

Quote:
should i attempt maybe 400x8?
yep no reason why not

Luck
Reply With Quote

  #306  
Old 13-02-2008, 00:07
Zenoth's Avatar
Junior Member
Zenoth's System Specs
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Alright supershanks look at this, I almost got it right for 3.6Ghz...

MB Intelligent Tweaker (MIT)
Robust Graphics Booster: Auto
CPU Clock Ratio: 9x
CPU Host Clock Control: Enabled
CPU Host Frequency(Mhz) : 400
PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) : 100
C.I.A.2: Disabled
Performance Enhance : Standard
System Memory Multiplier (SPD) : 2.66D (3:4)
Memory Frequency(Mhz): 1066
DRAM Timing Selectable : Manual

Standard Timing Control
CAS Latency Time: : 5
DRAM RAS# to CAS# : 5
DRAM RAS# Precharge : 5
Precharge Delay(tRAS) : 18

Advanced Timing Control
ACT to ACT Delay(tRRD) : 4
Rank Write to READ Delay : 4
Write To Precharge Delay : 8
Refresh to ACT Delay : 62
Read To Precharge Delay : 4
tRD : 8
tRD Phase Adjustment : Auto
Command to #CS Timing: : 2

Clock Driving and Skew Control
CPU/PCIEX Clock Driving Control : 800mv
CPU Clock Skew Control : Normal
(G)MCH Clock Skew Control : Normal

System Voltage Control : Manual
DDR2 OverVoltage Control : +0.15v (2.00v)
PCI-E OverVoltage Control : Normal
FSB OverVoltage Control : +0.20v
(G)MCH OverVoltage Control : +0.175v
MCH Reference Voltage Control : Normal
DDR Reference Voltage Control : Normal
DDR Termination Voltage Control : Normal
CPU GTLREF1 Voltage* : Normal
CPU GTLREF2 Voltage* : Normal
CPU Voltage Control : 1.30000v (1.280v in CPU-z)
Normal CPU Vcore : 1.22500v


With these settings my Orthos Blend test lasted 5 hours and 33 minutes before it failed, so far it has been the longest test time I've reached before a failure occurred, so I must be near stable settings. From my observations I've noticed that the Refresh to ACT Delay setting is greatly influencing on the overall stability. When I reduce that setting to less than 60 then none of my Prime95 or Orthos tests (Blend, with the Memory being tested of course) would last longer than 2 hours, or less. Above 61 it lasts for 3+ hours, at 62 like I've set it to, it lasted as I said a little more than 5 hours.

When I set everything to the factory defaults the BIOS tells me that Refresh to ACT Delay is set to 68, and that the four main timings tCL, tCRD, tRP and tRAS) are set to 5-7-7-24, however the Memory's frequency is properly set to 1066, but at default it doesn't run at a 1:1 ratio (usually it runs at 5:4). So I have no choices but to set everything manually. The more I play with the settings and the more I'm starting to believe that the actual Memory sticks themselves are physically in good shape and far from being faulty (although it still remains a possibility), and that my instability issues might just well come from the BIOS or just the Motherboard in general not being entirely compatible with the Crucial Ballistix modules. Because after all the actual Crucial brand is not listed at all in the officially Gigabyte's supported memory modules list for the GA-X38-DQ6 on their web-site.

As I type this I'm trying with the following settings, still for 3.6Ghz...

MB Intelligent Tweaker (MIT)
Robust Graphics Booster: Auto
CPU Clock Ratio: 9x
CPU Host Clock Control: Enabled
CPU Host Frequency(Mhz) : 400
PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) : 100
C.I.A.2: Disabled
Performance Enhance : Standard
System Memory Multiplier (SPD) : 2.66D (3:4)
Memory Frequency(Mhz): 1066
DRAM Timing Selectable : Manual

Standard Timing Control
CAS Latency Time: : 5
DRAM RAS# to CAS# : 5
DRAM RAS# Precharge : 5
Precharge Delay(tRAS) : 18

Advanced Timing Control
ACT to ACT Delay(tRRD) : 4
Rank Write to READ Delay : 4, now set to 10
Write To Precharge Delay : 8, now set to 10
Refresh to ACT Delay : 62, now set to 68
Read To Precharge Delay : 4
tRD : 8
tRD Phase Adjustment : Auto
Command to #CS Timing: : 2

Clock Driving and Skew Control
CPU/PCIEX Clock Driving Control : 800mv
CPU Clock Skew Control : Normal
(G)MCH Clock Skew Control : Normal

System Voltage Control : Manual
DDR2 OverVoltage Control : +0.15v (2.00v), now set to +0.25v (2.10v)
PCI-E OverVoltage Control : Normal
FSB OverVoltage Control : +0.20v
(G)MCH OverVoltage Control : +0.175v
MCH Reference Voltage Control : Normal
DDR Reference Voltage Control : Normal
DDR Termination Voltage Control : Normal
CPU GTLREF1 Voltage* : Normal
CPU GTLREF2 Voltage* : Normal
CPU Voltage Control : 1.30000v (1.280v in CPU-z)
Normal CPU Vcore : 1.22500v


I hope it remains stable forever and not crash at all.

But you know what's even more weird in all this? It's the fact that while it was stress testing in Orthos Blend yesterday I could launch Steam and play Team Fortress 2 without a single crash (and TF2 usually uses about 75% to 90% of a single CPU Core). I also let my P2P program run in the background. Later I could play Diablo II and then later I even played Age of Empires III. Not a single one of the games I've tried ever crashed once... yet Orthos failed. I am aware that no games out there stresses Memory and CPU like Orthos or Prime95 do, but still... I'm not sure about what could be wrong but if it ain't the Memory only then I don't know what it is.
Reply With Quote

  #307  
Old 13-02-2008, 01:04
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 3,062
Thanks: 3
Thanked 200 Times in 174 Posts
Default

What size fft did it fail on ??
The dram voltage looks liker the most likely suspect. the 8500 is rated at 2.2v the jded ddr2 std is 1.80v so DDR2 OverVoltage Control : = 2.2-1.8=0.4v
Quote:
Robust Graphics Booster: Auto
= Turbo
Quote:
Precharge Delay(tRAS) : 18
12 should be ok probably 10
Quote:
Refresh to ACT Delay : 62
30 ~ 35 should be ok
Quote:
Write To Precharge Delay : 8
8 as now ~6

Quote:
CPU/PCIEX Clock Driving Control : 800mv
1000mv

Keep up the good work your getting there
Reply With Quote

  #308  
Old 13-02-2008, 01:25
Zenoth's Avatar
Junior Member
Zenoth's System Specs
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Ok, the second settings in my previous post gave me 3 hours and 29 seconds before it failed.

I'm now testing the following:

MB Intelligent Tweaker (MIT)
Robust Graphics Booster: Turbo
CPU Clock Ratio: 9x
CPU Host Clock Control: Enabled
CPU Host Frequency(Mhz) : 400
PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) : 100
C.I.A.2: Disabled
Performance Enhance : Standard
System Memory Multiplier (SPD) : 2.66D (3:4)
Memory Frequency(Mhz): 1066
DRAM Timing Selectable : Manual

Standard Timing Control
CAS Latency Time: : 5
DRAM RAS# to CAS# : 5
DRAM RAS# Precharge : 5
Precharge Delay(tRAS) : 18

Advanced Timing Control
ACT to ACT Delay(tRRD) : 4
Rank Write to READ Delay : 10
Write To Precharge Delay : 8
Refresh to ACT Delay : 68
Read To Precharge Delay : 4
tRD : 8
tRD Phase Adjustment : Auto
Command to #CS Timing: : 2

Clock Driving and Skew Control
CPU/PCIEX Clock Driving Control : 1000mv
CPU Clock Skew Control : Normal
(G)MCH Clock Skew Control : Normal

System Voltage Control : Manual
DDR2 OverVoltage Control : +0.40v (2.25v)
PCI-E OverVoltage Control : Normal
FSB OverVoltage Control : +0.20v
(G)MCH OverVoltage Control : +0.175v
MCH Reference Voltage Control : Normal
DDR Reference Voltage Control : Normal
DDR Termination Voltage Control : Normal
CPU GTLREF1 Voltage* : Normal
CPU GTLREF2 Voltage* : Normal
CPU Voltage Control : 1.30000v (1.280v in CPU-z)
Normal CPU Vcore : 1.22500v

Last edited by Zenoth; 13-02-2008 at 01:36..
Reply With Quote

  #309  
Old 13-02-2008, 03:16
Zenoth's Avatar
Junior Member
Zenoth's System Specs
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Well, bad news, it failed once more, and it took 1 hour and 37 minutes.

http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/646/orthostc0.png

I don't know what to do anymore. I think I'll just leave it as is, because my games don't crash, and eventually I will go buy new memory modules from another brand, perhaps Corsair or OCZ, but I won't touch Crucial anymore I don't even want to RMA them. I've increased the vCore from 1.30000v to 1.33500v, giving me 1.312v in CPU-z, hoping that the Orthos failure was related to a lack of voltage (although I highly doubt it, considering some people can each 3.6Ghz on stock voltage.

My last theory is that the Power Supply just can't do it (Antec NeoHE 550).

Last edited by Zenoth; 13-02-2008 at 03:28..
Reply With Quote

Prime stable! :)
  #310  
Old 13-02-2008, 03:52
Vbs Vbs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Prime stable! :)

Hi all!

This is my first post. I've bought this week my new cpu/mobo/ram and after throughly reading most of this huge thread, I'd like to share with you guys my o/c so far. Many thanks to supershanks and dynapl (we have the same memory kit ) for their informative and helpful posts!

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 GHz (BX80562Q6600SLACR, Version #: E10342-001)
Cooler: Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme + Scythe "S-FLEX™" S-FDB 120mm (SFF21F, 1600rpm) [review]
Motherboard: The one and only GA-X38-DQ6
RAM: G.Skill 4GB (2x2GB) PC2-8000 (F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ), CL5-5-5-15 2.0~2.1V
PSU: Enermax Liberty 500W (ELT500AWT) (has 2 +12V rails of 22A each)

My overclock so far has been 7+ hours stable in Prime 25.6 (on Vista x64) and 5+ hours Memtest x86+ 2.0!
Temps: 29ºC idle / 50ºC full load (Prime 4 cores, In-place large FFTs)

------------- BIOS Settings -----------------------------
MB Intelligent Tweaker (MIT) BIOS F5h
Robust Graphics Booster: [Turbo]
CPU Clock Ratio: [9X]
CPU Host Clock Control: [Enabled]
CPU Host Frequency(Mhz) : [400]
PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) : [100]
C.I.A.2: [Disabled]
Performance Enhance : [Extreme]
System Memory Multiplier (SPD) [2.66D]
Memory Frequency(Mhz): 800 1064
DRAM Timing Selectable : [Manual]
********Standard Timing Control ***********
CAS Latency Time: 5 [5]
DRAM RAS# to CAS# : 5 [5]
DRAM RAS# Precharge : 5 [5]
Precharge Delay(tRAS) : 15 [12]
******** Advanced Timing Control ***************
ACT to ACT Delay(tRRD) : 3 [1]
Rank Write to READ Delay : 3 [3]
Write To Precharge Delay : 6 [3]
Refresh to ACT Delay : 52 [45]
Read To Precharge Delay : 3 [1]
Static tRead Value : 8 [6]
Static tRead Phase Adjust : 5 [Auto]
Command Rate (CMD) : 2 [2T]
******** Clock Driving and Skew Control **********
CPU/PCIEX Clock Driving Control : [1000mV]
CPU Clock Skew Control : [Normal]
(G)MCH Clock Skew Control : [Normal]
System Voltage Control: [Manual]
DDR2 OverVoltage Control : [+0.25V]
PCI-E OverVoltage Control : [+0.10V]
FSB OverVoltage Control : [+0.10V]
(G)MCH OverVoltage Control : [+0.025]
MCH Reference Voltage Control : [Normal]
DDR Reference Voltage Control : [Normal]
DDR Termination Voltage Control : [Normal]
CPU Voltage Control : [1.41250V]
Normal CPU Vcore: 1.26250

Memory timings are the most tight possible without crashes on boot or errors in Memtest

Things of note:
1) Disabling CPU Smart FAN Control is helpful on trying to get the right Vcore, to make sure the CPU is getting 100% cooled (you can Enable the fan control afterwards and use EasyTune to adjust the fan speeds)
2) BIOS F5h seems to be using "Loadline Calibration" Enabled by default (this setting doesn't even appear in this BIOS, only in BIOS F7). This rather "controversial" setting helps reduce Vdroop, and could be the reason why I had a stable o/c at this Vcore with BIOS F5h (I couldn't get stable in F7 with the same settings above and with Loadline Calibration on Disabled).
3) If you're gaming on Vista x64, get 4GB of RAM, the speed increase was noticeable in 2006, imagine now...

Cheers,
Vbs

Last edited by Vbs; 13-02-2008 at 12:23..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/reviews/311-gigabyte-ga-x38-dq6-blog.html
Posted By For Type Date
[OC-775]Gigabyte X38-series - Tweaking, Cooling & Overclocking Algemeen - GoT This thread Refback 14-12-2008 04:12
Official GIGABYTE X38-DQ6/X38T-DQ6 Info/BIOS Thread - Page 95 - XtremeSystems Forums This thread Refback 11-12-2008 09:22
Will a Zalman 9700NT fit on a GA-X38-DQ6 ? - techPowerUp! Forums This thread Refback 06-12-2008 03:13
Official GIGABYTE X38-DQ6/X38T-DQ6 Info/BIOS Thread - Page 114 - XtremeSystems Forums This thread Refback 04-12-2008 09:33
[OC-775]Gigabyte X38-series - Tweaking, Cooling & Overclocking Algemeen - GoT This thread Refback 29-11-2008 19:45
Official GIGABYTE X38-DQ6/X38T-DQ6 Info/BIOS Thread - Page 114 - XtremeSystems Forums This thread Refback 26-11-2008 15:59
AnandTech - Gigabyte EP45 Extreme This thread Refback 05-11-2008 22:13
Mémoire compatible GA-X38-DQ6 This thread Refback 03-11-2008 05:59
Wie Crazy Cool vom Gigabyte X38-DQ6 entfernen - ForumBase This thread Refback 28-10-2008 02:26
Official GIGABYTE X38-DQ6/X38T-DQ6 Info/BIOS Thread - Page 114 - XtremeSystems Forums This thread Refback 27-10-2008 15:58
Thoughts on this OC? - Page 4 - XtremeSystems Forums This thread Refback 25-10-2008 17:47