Go Back   Clunk's Forums. > Product Reviews. > Reviews.

Reply
 
LinkBack (5) Thread Tools Display Modes

  #41  
Old 31-01-2008, 08:56
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,530
Thanks: 4
Thanked 321 Times in 277 Posts
Default

Hi Ace,
Welcome M8 Looks like the activation pigeon finally got to you, must have had a head wind

Thanks for the explanation , like i said i've altered the original ABITFAE.BAT file on my usb stick & will be running with your command line in future, much nicer behaved

Cheers
Reply With Quote

  #42  
Old 31-01-2008, 16:09
Ace-a-Rue's Avatar
Senior Member
Ace-a-Rue's System Specs
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 474
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

thanks...i had a heck of a time to register with all those bot questions...LOL...it took several attempts..hehehe...anyway, the tweety bird made it.

i'm baffled on why abit does not have the new bios file coded to update the boot block area...it was that way on the 1st beta bios for the IP35 Pro where the boot block was not being updated...not until i flashed the boot block did the performance increased to match my AB9 QuadGT board....AMI bioses do update the boot block as the last item of the flash...their flashing program shows that specific area being flashed.
Reply With Quote

  #43  
Old 31-01-2008, 16:37
Clunk's Avatar
Monkey Trousers.
Clunk's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 11,789
Thanks: 809
Thanked 693 Times in 606 Posts
Default

Welcome to the forums

The good thing about all those bot questions is that it keeps us relatively spam and idiot free, with a few exceptions, notably the nappy spammer who has been 7 months pregnant for 10 years.
Reply With Quote

  #44  
Old 31-01-2008, 16:42
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,530
Thanks: 4
Thanked 321 Times in 277 Posts
Default

Might be worth adding a note to your procedure or maybe contacting abit, you think ?? Like i said it nearly did for me , the board was going into the wall until i flashed back to 11 & coincidently using your command line to manually flash.

I've a strong suspicion some of those earlier 45nm multi issues etc., may be down to this.
I'll add the command line tip to the bta bios index.

How's that dfi behaving now
Reply With Quote

  #45  
Old 31-01-2008, 17:56
Clunk's Avatar
Monkey Trousers.
Clunk's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 11,789
Thanks: 809
Thanked 693 Times in 606 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supershanks View Post

How's that dfi behaving now
Was that for me?

If so...

Yes, going good, 4140Mhz stable so far with the G0, not tried the 8400 yet until theres more of a verdict on the temps
Reply With Quote

  #46  
Old 31-01-2008, 19:16
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,530
Thanks: 4
Thanked 321 Times in 277 Posts
Default

Quote:
Was that for me?
no ace has one as well
Reply With Quote

Strange temperature anomalies
  #47  
Old 31-01-2008, 20:36
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,530
Thanks: 4
Thanked 321 Times in 277 Posts
Default Strange temperature anomalies

I mentioned in the earlier post showing my Occt Stable that temps were a little warm , especially as i'm on water.

So i ran a little overnight experiment. Nothing radical, in fact i put everything back to stock, yep ok you heard me right
Vcore set to vid of 1.1225v.

So it primed all night small ffts to test cpu. :-
3,000 9x333 VC= 1.1225v

cleared coretemp log prior to run, so yhat i could get stats:-


Now here's one i did (much) earlier , using the Q6600 Go
8x450 @1.40v Vcore


Bear in mind this was a blend test so we need to compare the max temps over the Coretemp run for the Q6600

So we have 2x 55.5 +2x57 = 55.5 average

So boittom line on water we have :-
8400 = 46.9C Avge
Q6600 = 55.5C


Now thinkinng about Air cooling , i was able to run on air at 3.6 with the abit

Default 9x400 12HR Prime Stable Now that was about the max i would like to be on air. Looking on the 8400 there's only a 10C window between max & stock.

Are the temps right??
Not sure, there are divided opinions. It might be the temps are off.

My own feeling at the moment is that even if the temps are wrong , it would be difficult to sell on such a chip, doesn't really hack it , telling a buyer "oh ignore the temps". So will play a bit more but looking hard for an explanation/fix for these temps.

It's a sobering thought that 2 of these will go to the Yorkfield Quads. OPeople thought the Q6600 B3 ran warm

Continued .........

Last edited by supershanks; 30-12-2008 at 22:46.
Reply With Quote

  #48  
Old 31-01-2008, 21:09
Ace-a-Rue's Avatar
Senior Member
Ace-a-Rue's System Specs
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 474
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

...well, the DFi is in the closet...LOL...it was 'ok' but i like the simplicity of the Pro board.
Reply With Quote

Reading the CPU Temp Values
  #49  
Old 31-01-2008, 23:20
supershanks's Avatar
Super Moderator
supershanks's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hamilton - Scotland
Posts: 4,530
Thanks: 4
Thanked 321 Times in 277 Posts
Default Reading the CPU Temp Values

A great post here unclewebb on reading CPU Temps
Might give us some understanding re temps.

Update: 06/03/2008
See aslo unclewebb's Real Temp - New temp program for Intel Core processors

1) Generate CPUZ.txt File



2) Open text file , cpuz.txt you will see n blocks like this depending on the number of cores
go to reg 19C & note the DTS value, highlighted value in eax eg 3C
Code:
 [Scroll Down]
CPU Thread 1
APIC ID			1
Topology		Processor ID 0, Core ID 1, Thread ID 0
Type			01008001h
Max CPUID level		0000000Ah
Max CPUID ext. level	80000008h

Function		eax		ebx		ecx		edx
0x00000000		0x0000000A	0x756E6547	0x6C65746E	0x49656E69
0x00000001		0x00010676	0x01020800	0x0008E3FD	0xBFEBFBFF
0x00000002		0x05B0B101	0x005657F0	0x00000000	0x2CB4304E
0x00000003		0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000
0x00000004		0x04000121	0x01C0003F	0x0000003F	0x00000001
0x00000004		0x04000122	0x01C0003F	0x0000003F	0x00000001
0x00000004		0x04004143	0x05C0003F	0x00000FFF	0x00000001
0x00000005		0x00000040	0x00000040	0x00000003	0x00022220
0x00000006		0x00000001	0x00000002	0x00000001	0x00000000
0x00000007		0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000
0x00000008		0x00000400	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000
0x00000009		0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000
0x0000000A		0x07280202	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000503
0x80000000		0x80000008	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000
0x80000001		0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000001	0x20000000
0x80000002		0x65746E49	0x2952286C	0x726F4320	0x4D542865
0x80000003		0x44203229	0x43206F75	0x20205550	0x45202020
0x80000004		0x30303438	0x20402020	0x30302E33	0x007A4847
0x80000005		0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000
0x80000006		0x00000000	0x00000000	0x18008040	0x00000000
0x80000007		0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000
0x80000008		0x00003024	0x00000000	0x00000000	0x00000000

Cache descriptor	Level 1 D	32 KB	1 threads	
Cache descriptor	Level 1 I	32 KB	1 threads	
Cache descriptor	Level 2 U	6 MB	2 threads	

MSR 0x0000001B		edx = 0x00000000	eax = 0xFEE00800
MSR 0x000000E8		edx = 0x000004C2	eax = 0x312229F5
MSR 0x00000017		edx = 0x04000000	eax = 0x88848920
MSR 0x000000CD		edx = 0x00000000	eax = 0x00000804
MSR 0x0000003F		edx = 0x00000000	eax = 0x00000000
MSR 0x000000CE		edx = 0x001A0920	eax = 0x19190718
MSR 0x000001A0		edx = 0x00000044	eax = 0x60962489
MSR 0x000000EE		edx = 0x00000000	eax = 0x867D1300
MSR 0x0000011E		edx = 0x00000000	eax = 0xBE782111
MSR 0x0000019C          edx = 0x00000000        eax = 0x883C0000
MSR 0x00000198		edx = 0x061A0920	eax = 0x06000920
MSR 0x00000199		edx = 0x00000000	eax = 0x00000920
3) Convert to Decimal


4) Obtain Absolute Temp Deduct vakue from 3 from TjMax for your CPU, In this case TjMax = 105C
so Core Temp = 105C - 60 = 45C Now that's with my cpu at idle.

Temp = TjMax - DTS

OPtional view of Temps - Delta
Rather than look at the Absolute temperature as shown in 4) Ann alternative is to lok at the Delta or the decimal DTS.
Using this approach is rather like drivibg to a speed limit , the lower the DTS the closer you are to the limit.

Coretemp can be changed to show the Delta :-


As unclewebb says using this method
Quote:
As long as you always have some headroom as reported by the DTS and your computer is stable at full Prime load then there is no reason to be too worried about your absolute temperature
In other words just check that your under the limit.

Clear

Last edited by supershanks; 30-12-2008 at 22:47.
Reply With Quote

  #50  
Old 31-01-2008, 23:50
Clunk's Avatar
Monkey Trousers.
Clunk's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 11,789
Thanks: 809
Thanked 693 Times in 606 Posts
Default

But what does it tell you about your CPU?, with regards to the high temps, are they correct?

Whaddayathink?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/reviews/1795-intel-e8400-wolfdale-living-review.html
Posted By For Type Date
worth getting E8500 over E8400? - [H]ard|Forum This thread Refback 05-02-2010 21:52
Intel E8400 Wolfdale Living Review This thread Refback 13-04-2009 09:01
[TOPIC UNIQUE] La gamme processeur intel This thread Refback 26-01-2009 21:01
Unofficial Wolfdale E8400/E8500 OC Reports - Page 24 - Overclockers Forums Post #0 Refback 01-09-2008 18:23
[TOPIC UNIQUE] La gamme processeur intel This thread Refback 22-08-2008 14:14



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:16.


vBulletin skins developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright© Clunk.org.uk 2010
| Home | Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |