DFI LT X38-T2R LanParty - Living Review. - Page 5

death · #41 26-01-2008, 09:57

420x9 3870Mhz 1.45v 3-3-3-3 840Mhz RAM 1:1.

is that run occ stable m8

Clunk · #42 26-01-2008, 14:05

Nope, not with those voltages.

More later

GSte · #43 26-01-2008, 14:59

Ooooooooohhhhh. liking those RAM voltage options, fed up of only having 0.05v increments to play with, may make the ballistix last a bit longer per set if I could lower the voltage fractionally

...... or not.........

Clunk · #44 26-01-2008, 15:03

I removed the heatspreaders on a brand new set of Tracers...the ones from the other thread that I was supposed to send back.

Hopefully these will last a bit longer

m@husalem · #45 26-01-2008, 16:04

I guess you know...the BL2KIT12864AA1065 sticks can take 2.4v without a problem when cooled actively and then run with 4-4-4-12@575Mhz. With the same voltage, they run with 5-5-5-15@615Mhz.

Clunk · #46 26-01-2008, 17:23

The reason I took off the heat spreaders can be found in this thread.

I try and avoid putting much more than 2.3v through any D9 RAM nowadays as I have found that for any kind of prolonged use, even with active cooling usually results in dead sticks pretty quickly.

Your mileage may vary

Clunk · #47 27-01-2008, 23:08

Added a few more quick results, more to come over the next few days

GSte · #48 27-01-2008, 23:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by m@husalem

I guess you know...the BL2KIT12864AA1065 sticks can take 2.4v without a problem when cooled actively and then run with 4-4-4-12@575Mhz. With the same voltage, they run with 5-5-5-15@615Mhz.

Yeah, I've found 2.4v seems to kill them pretty soon even with a Dominator fan.... 2.35 lets me do what I want but still feels a bit high for D9 chips. Going to get some ProMos and have a play, they supposedly like 2.4+

death · #49 28-01-2008, 01:41

those clocks on are rock m8

zfactor · #50 28-01-2008, 01:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clunk

These aren't stable, I was just seeing how high I could go using air cooling.

440x9 3960Mhz 5-5-5-15 880Mhz RAM 1:1.

CPU-Z Validator Database

445x9 4008Mhz 5-5-5-15 890Mhz RAM 1:1.

CPU-Z Validator Database

450x9 4056Mhz 5-5-5-15 900Mhz RAM 1:1.

CPU-Z Validator Database

456x9 4104Mhz 5-5-5-15 912Mhz RAM 1:1.

CPU-Z Validator Database

462x9 4164Mhz 5-5-5-15 924Mhz RAM 1:1.

CPU-Z Validator Database

470x9 4236Mhz 5-5-5-15 940Mhz RAM 1:1.

CPU-Z Validator Database

476x9 4284Mhz 5-5-5-15 952Mhz RAM 1:1.

CPU-Z Validator Database

Couldn't go any further on air.

so none of those were stable at all?? see it seems to me everyone may be feeding me crap... not here but on other forums everyone says with this mobo i should be able to do a stable 450+ on air on a quad no sweat at all.. 24/7.. they claim to be able to run around 3.8-4.0 24/7 with this mobo...

is this crap in your opinion?? i mean i can achieve 3.6 on a quad with nearly any p35 or x38 mobo out there so then spending more money on a so called better board seems piontless does it not?? or is it just me?

i have a freind who runs his q6600 at 3.7 27/7 on a 110$ blood iron??