Following my questions in a previous
post I bought a Q6700 at the weekend. I also grabbed a pair of the same memory sticks I had form my mate who just bought some 4gb (2x2gb) dominator 8500 memory.
I dropped the cpu in sticking with my original 2 sticks of memory and by upping the voltages and
fsb have got 3.17Ghz from the chip with the mem at 793mhz.
Now comparing my
bios to my mates it appears that it was my Mobo that was causing my lack of over-clockabilty on my P5B/e6600 combo. My mobo is rev 1.03g and his is a 1.04g. The difference is he gets
NB,
SB and ICH voltage options in
bios which I dont. I guess there is no way of getting these options in my
bios as they are enabled in some different hardware between our revisions of board.
But I am pleased with that as an overclock for now, new mobo and a water cooling setup are on my shopping list.
I tried using the 2 other
ram sticks to give me 4gb and have discovered the minefield of 4 sick memory configurations... I found some heavy threads on houseofhelp.com notably
Thread one and
Thread two and now I have some questions...
So using all four assuming i enable memory remap and set /pae in boot ini of win xp the most i can hope to get is ~3gb of memory rated at ddr800 running at ddr667 with maybe a slight overclock but I'd have to use 1066 memory to get 4 one gigs running at 800 (upto ~1000 depending on overclocking ability of board).
So which is better for overclocking? 2x2gb or 4x1gb im confused as to why people would use 4 sticks if they dont run as fast as 2 sticks.
When I get a new motherboard (after spending up on my Q6700) in a few months, am I better sticking with just 2x1gb pc6400, would it be worth struggling to get all four sticks working (i already have the other 2!) or is there no memory bandwidth improvement using all four slots?
Do I need to save up for 2x2gb sticks (probably pc8500)?
I think i just need a pointer for the penny to drop, i hope anyway!
G