E8600 overclocking temperatures
  #1  
Old 22-01-2009, 21:00
Young 'un
PeterStoba's System Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
Default E8600 overclocking temperatures

Hello,

New here, new-ish to overclocking too so be nice

I've got an E8600 and a Gigabyte P35 (full specs above or to the side, wherever they are on this site) and currently got it running at 3.4GHz (extreme overclocking here). Loading at 46/48 on core 0/1 respectively, wondering what is a same temperature for running a 45nm chip, Intel says 72c but that is low isn't it?

Thanks,

Peter.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 22-01-2009, 21:08
affiliate13's Avatar
Even a bust clock tells the right time twice a day.
affiliate13's System Specs
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 3,987
Thanks: 334
Thanked 332 Times in 284 Posts
Default

Hi Welcome,
Sounds like you are fine with those load figures. I run mine at under 60c at load under water but i had been using a xigmatek s1283 which gave me 4.5Ghz/1.32vcore/70c(heavy load).
__________________
New to the Forum? Add your specs to your profile with this GUIDE
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 22-01-2009, 21:54
Junior Member
Billabong's System Specs
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ex NZ, now in Oz
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Several points to consider Peter.

Ambient air temperature
The application that is reporting the temps
The cpu cooler
Sensor functionality
The application used to load cpu
vcore

My E8600 is currently 4.0GHz (500*8) with 1.25v vcore, TRUE120 cooler and with an ambient air temp of 25°C Real Temp 2.90 beta RC9 reports my load temps (IntelBurnTest) as 56°C
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 23-01-2009, 01:20
Kelainefes's Avatar
Blaaaah
Kelainefes's System Specs
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Italy, Sardinia
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 288
Thanked 321 Times in 303 Posts
Default

Welcome!

If you are using Coretemp or the Real Temp beta, those temps (if you are loading with Prim95 or an equivalent such as OCCT) are absolutely fine, provided your temp sensors are working correctly wich is not always the case.
What are the load temps of the CPU sensor? I mean the "single" temp that you can read with HWMonitor or SpeedFan, not the individual cores.
If you used Intel Burn Test to get those load temps and you got those results, i'm afraid your sensors are off.
__________________




Quote:
I see... Well. At this point I should inform you that I intend to form my own team, and destroy the molecular bonds that bind your very matter together and reduce the resulting particulate chaos to tears.
Quote:
...If he doesn't win this decision I'm gonna burn my headset and run naked through the crowd.
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 23-01-2009, 22:16
Young 'un
PeterStoba's System Specs
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
Default



These are my load temps at 3.55GHz (taking it easy for now) and they seem to be ok as my room is a little hot and I don't have the best cooler tbh. They were done using OCCT, what confuses me is the vcore, core temp says the vid is 1.25, cpu-z says i am running at 1.184v, which jumps up to 1.216v under load, both are below 1.25 which is the vid? What do I trust?

Going to check the BIOS now to see what the voltage is set at and bump the fsb up a little more.
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 23-01-2009, 22:52
Kelainefes's Avatar
Blaaaah
Kelainefes's System Specs
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Italy, Sardinia
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 288
Thanked 321 Times in 303 Posts
Default

Set the vCore to 1.25, the FSB to 400, the multi to 10x, memory to 1:1.
That should boot and give yo ua nice 4GHz.
Test with Prime 95 and if is unstable increase vCore a little bit till all is ok.
Those temps are ridicolously low, don't even begin to think about worrying till you hit over 60C.
The VID is a ingìformation written on your CPU, basically it is there so your motherboard can feed it the proper voltage.
If you enable PPM/EIST, VID is dynamic, so it will be aroound 1.1 at the lowest (6x) multi, and about 1.2-1.25 at the highest multi (10x).
Trust what CPU-Z says.
__________________




Quote:
I see... Well. At this point I should inform you that I intend to form my own team, and destroy the molecular bonds that bind your very matter together and reduce the resulting particulate chaos to tears.
Quote:
...If he doesn't win this decision I'm gonna burn my headset and run naked through the crowd.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
eXtremepixels
Copyright© Clunk.org.uk 2010
| Home | Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |