q9450 & UT-X48-T2R ocing help
  #1  
Old 17-09-2008, 02:25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default q9450 & UT-X48-T2R ocing help

Hey everybody,

I had a stable overclock till i flashed to the latest beta bios in order to use my HD4870X2. Now i can't get a stable overclock.

Also i get 70 degrees C on all 4 cores.

I know i need to post my settings but is it OK to use the LT-x48-t2r template as i can't find a UT-x48-T2R template?

Thanks
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 17-09-2008, 02:45
Clunk's Avatar
Monkey Trousers.
Clunk's System Specs
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 7,174
Thanks: 363
Thanked 343 Times in 320 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Welcome to the forums

Yep, its the same template.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 17-09-2008, 12:44
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clunk View Post
Welcome to the forums

Yep, its the same template.
Thank you

Code:
CPU Feature
Thermal Management Control: Disabled
PPM(EIST) Mode: Disabled
Limit CPUID MaxVal: Disabled
CIE Function: Disabled
Execute Disable Bit: Disabled
Virtualization Technology: Disabled
Core Multi-Processing: Enabled

Exist Setup Shutdown: Mode 2
Shutdown after AC Loss: Disabled
CLOCK VC0 divider: AUTO
CPU Clock Ratio Unlock: Enabled
CPU Clock Ratio: 8X
Target CPU Clock: 3200
CPU Clock: 400
Boot Up Clock:
DRAM Speed: 400/800
Target DRAM Speed: ddr800
PCIE Clock: 100mhz
PCIE Slot Config: 1X 1X

CPU Spread Spectrum: Disabled
PCIE Spread Spectrum: Disabled
SATA Spread Spectrum: Disabled

Voltage Settings
CPU VID Control: 1.35
CPU VID Special Add: Disabled
DRAM Voltage Control: 2.1
SB Core/CPU PLL Voltage: 1.64
NB Core Voltage: 1.392
CPU VTT Voltage: 1.2
Vcore Droop Control: Enabled
Clockgen Voltage Control: 3.45v
GTL+ Buffers Strength: Strong
Host Slew Rate: Weak
GTL REF Voltage Control: Disable
x CPU GTL1/3 REF Volt: 110
x CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt: 110
x North Bridge GTL REF Volt: 110

DRAM Timing
Enhance Data transmitting: AUTO
Enhance Addressing: AUTO
T2 Dispatch: Disabled

Clock Setting Fine Delay
Ch1 Clock Crossing Setting: AUTO
DIMM 1 Clock fine delay: Current
DIMM 2 Clock fine delay: Current
Ch 1 Command fine delay: Current
Ch 1 Control fine delay: Current


Ch2 Clock Crossing Setting: AUTO
DIMM 3 Clock fine delay: Current
DIMM 4 Clock fine delay: Current
Ch 2 Command fine delay: Current
Ch 2 Control fine delay: Current

Ch1Ch2 CommonClock Setting: Auto

Ch1 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
Ch1 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
Ch1 Command to CS Delay: Auto

Ch2 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
Ch2 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto
Ch2 Command to CS Delay: Auto 

CAS Latency Time (tCL):4
RAS# to CAS# Delay (tRCD):4
RAS# Precharge (tRP):4
Precharge Delay (tRAS):12All Precharge to Act: AUTO
REF to ACT Delay (tRFC): AUTO
Performance LVL (Read Delay) (tRD): AUTO

Read delay phase adjust: Enter

Ch1 Read delay phase (4~0)
Channel 1 Phase 0 Pull-In: Auto
Channel 1 Phase 1 Pull-In: Auto
Channel 1 Phase 2 Pull-In: Auto
Channel 1 Phase 3 Pull-In: Auto
Channel 1 Phase 4 Pull-In: Auto

Ch2 Read delay phase (4~0)
Channel 2 Phase 0 Pull-In: Auto
Channel 2 Phase 1 Pull-In: Auto
Channel 2 Phase 2 Pull-In: Auto
Channel 2 Phase 3 Pull-In: Auto
Channel 2 Phase 4 Pull-In: Auto

MCH ODT Latency: AUTO
Write to PRE Delay (tWR): AUTO
Rank Write to Read (tWTR): AUTO
ACT to ACT Delay (tRRD): AUTO
Read to Write Delay (tRDWR): AUTO
Ranks Write to Write (tWRWR): AUTO
Ranks Read to Read (tRDRD): AUTO
Ranks Write to Read (tWRRD): AUTO
Read CAS# Precharge (tRTP): AUTO
ALL PRE to Refresh: AUTO
CPU vid as reported by core temp is 1.25V but cpu-z reports core voltage as 1.392v

At the moment this has been on prime 95 for 5 hours 20 and is still ok.


But I would really like to get my temps down. I have seen a lot of ppl using GTL. I am not; is this the reason that i'm getting high core temps?

Core temperatures are:

Core temp: 70 70 68 69
Real temp core temperatures (the top line ):60 60 57 59
Speed fan: 65 65 62 64
PC wizard: 70 69 68 69 (however shows a processor temp of 63)

I have been told that core temp is the most accurate.

I would like my processor to last a few years

Thanks

Last edited by Cicatrix; 17-09-2008 at 17:18.. Reason: Added more info
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 17-09-2008, 17:10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ok it ran for 8 hours and 21 minutes before i got a rounding error:

Rounding was 0.5 expected less than 0.4.

should i try with vtt =1.25? increasing my vtt helped last time

What should i do?

Last edited by Cicatrix; 17-09-2008 at 17:30.. Reason: added more info
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:20.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright© Clunk.org.uk 2008
| Home | Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |