Quote:
Originally Posted by gandlers
wow, fast replies.
I have updated my specs.
I'm not too concearned about major oveclocking at the moment as I plan to get a water cooling setup in the next 6 months. My primary concearn is getting a little more speed (along with 2 more cores) and some decent memory ready for my mobo upgrade and watercooling setup further down the line.
I plan to get an asus board with a second pcie slot so i can have a second card to drive my old 17in lcd and give me a little more "desktop" space. I did have it running on the 2nd port on the 8800, but it slowed the card down when running hungry games (*cough* crysis *cough* FSX *cough*) so I figure that can wait 'till I have a mobo to drop a cheap second card into (or maybe my old 7900).
I just need advice on which memory would be "better" for my future plans.
Is the q6700 as "tweakable" as the q6600 slacr's?
G
|
If you are planning on a new board can you let us know which one you are planning on? It might be useful when choosing memory, some boards like some types of
RAM more than others.
The Q6700 is the same core as the Q6600 it just has a higher multi which makes reaching higher overclocks a little easier as you are less dependant on high
FSB, so if anything it allows more play when clocking - it is slightly more expensive though
If you were to buy a Q6600 they will mostly do 3.2-3.6Ghz easily eneough and the
RAM you have should let you get to 3.6Ghz(400x9) as you stand. So i am not worried about your existing
RAM right now for pairing with a Q6600/6700. If fact the
RAM you have is so godd that if you were to relax the timings down from C4 to C5 it will prolly do 900mhz msybe a bit more with the right volts and cooling
But i would seriously think about a different cooler if you plan to take the Q6600 over 3.2/3.4Ghz as the heat will increase.